Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 08:40:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 236754] java/openjdk11: platform-specific include dir at wrong place Message-ID: <bug-236754-8522-IWsGFQdjXe@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-236754-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-236754-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bugzilla Automation <bugzilla@FreeBSD.org> has asked freebsd-java mailing l= ist <java@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-feedback: Bug 236754: java/openjdk11: platform-specific include dir at wrong place https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236754 --- Description --- Based on a report on the mailing list. Previously: > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk8]$ tree /usr/local/openjdk8/include/ > /usr/local/openjdk8/include/ > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 classfile_constants.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 freebsd > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt_md.h > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni_md.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jdwpTransport.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmti.h > =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmticmlr.h now > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk8]$ tree /usr/local/openjdk11/include/ > /usr/local/openjdk11/include/ > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bsd > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt_md.h > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni_md.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 classfile_constants.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jdwpTransport.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmti.h > =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmticmlr.h freesbd vs bsd in ports I see: > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk8]$ find . -name jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/jdk/src/macosx/javavm/export/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/jdk/src/windows/javavm/export/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/jdk/src/solaris/javavm/export/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jni_md.h > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk11]$ find . -name jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/src/java.base/unix/native/include/jni_= md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/src/java.base/windows/native/include/j= ni_m d.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/su= ppor t/modules_include/java.base/bsd/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/su= ppor t/interim-image/include/bsd/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/jd= k/in clude/bsd/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/im= ages /jdk/include/bsd/jni_md.h It seems to be a bug, because I expect this to be platform-specific, and not generalized. This also applies to openjdk12.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236754-8522-IWsGFQdjXe>