From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 25 11:57:26 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6E0EE0
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 11:57:26 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from aoyama@peach.ne.jp)
Received: from moon.peach.ne.jp (moon.peach.ne.jp [203.141.148.98])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00398FC0A
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 11:57:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from moon.peach.ne.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by moon.peach.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE23239FA3;
 Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:57:24 +0900 (JST)
Received: from artemis (unknown [172.18.0.20])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by moon.peach.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9AB839D5E;
 Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:57:24 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <CF39233ED91241919AA069FC56CBC110@ad.peach.ne.jp>
From: "Daisuke Aoyama" <aoyama@peach.ne.jp>
To: "Andrew Turner" <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>
References: <B5F827FF91C94FF2AFEE00194A2BB2C5@ad.peach.ne.jp>
 <B508111FCE534B2CBA61F4D1EC1078D3@ad.peach.ne.jp>
 <20121225202326.1488fc5d@fubar.geek.nz>
In-Reply-To: <20121225202326.1488fc5d@fubar.geek.nz>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD/armv6z/clang on Raspberry Pi 512MB (with U-Boot + ubldr)
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:57:20 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 11:57:27 -0000

> As of r244640 we should have clang support in head. Do you still need
> to patch clang after this revision?

I didn't check/build it, but it seems that latest clang is OK for OABI.
However, it cannot be used in arm kernel because of TSIZ limitation.
(other default choice is my taste/fun, not requirements)

Please check below files in the patch:
sys/arm/include/vmparam.h
sys/conf/options.arm

In my case, at least MAXTSIZ=20MB is required for -O2 optimized world.
(-O1, -O0 are required more than -O2, of course)
So, changeable MAXTSIZ is useful for clang. Increasing MAXTSIZ might be 
better
when clang build. But I don't know what value is appropriate.

Note: the patch contains clang, ARM11 and RPI specific patches.

P.S.
Thank you for many of committing. Now binutils can be used without patch.
-- 
Daisuke Aoyama