Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 21:28:11 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Syscall as weak symbols Message-ID: <199804281128.VAA29547@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>This seems reasonable, provided weak symbols work right now. I would >>prefer a prefix of `__' or even `_' instead of `_syscall_'. > >Why? It seems to me that leading underscores are now over used and >essentially meaningless. A prefix of _syscall_ has meaning, and we >are not in danger of overflowing identifier length limits. The implementation method shouldn't be encoded in interface names. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804281128.VAA29547>