Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:39:39 -0700 From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: realtek performance (was Re: good ATI chipset results) Message-ID: <1129228779.1736.7.camel@server.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.0.20051013143249.08dea730@64.7.153.2> References: <6.2.3.4.0.20051013090818.07a5c9a0@64.7.153.2> <1129216390.8681.6.camel@server.mcneil.com> <200510131149.24411.jhb@freebsd.org> <62071.192.168.1.20.1129228299.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20051013143249.08dea730@64.7.153.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 14:33 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 02:31 PM 13/10/2005, Julien Gabel wrote: > > >I just want to say that there is some discussion in the past about the > >RealTek 8169S - not on amd64 plateform though (x86) - but it seems not > >so stable in all configuration. See the ml archives for references, and > >the PR kern/80005. > > Just to clarify, the NIC on the MB in question is a 100Mb rl, not re. Things have been rock-solid for me. The only initial problem before my performance issue was that the hardware checksum is broken for one of the directions. xmit I think. Cheers, Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1129228779.1736.7.camel>