From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 26 19:53:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA18572 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usr08.primenet.com (tlambert@usr08.primenet.com [206.165.6.208]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA18567; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA02076; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:53:12 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199709270253.TAA02076@usr08.primenet.com> Subject: Re: 'fxp' driver/hardware lossage (was Re: Alexander B. Povol's mail) To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 02:53:12 +0000 (GMT) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199709270110.SAA01062@implode.root.com> from "David Greenman" at Sep 26, 97 06:10:48 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >If this works, then a timer set to bogusly send a packet to ourselves > >would not bother anyone else on the network who wasn't in promiscuous > >mode and running a network monitor, and it would be filterable there. > > You can't send a packet to yourself under normal circumstances (ethernet > is a simplex device). I meant "send it addressed to my own address"... from what you say, though, the "ping soloutoin" probably is just a conicidence, so it's a non-starter. 8-(. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.