Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 May 2010 00:00:55 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        hselasky@c2i.net
Cc:        perforce@freebsd.org, zec@freebsd.org, gcooper@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 178978 for review
Message-ID:  <20100531.000055.923725949146439083.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <201005302101.02794.hselasky@c2i.net>
References:  <201005301444.o4UEidHb057496@repoman.freebsd.org> <AANLkTilpZTmKr3tTrfafgt5CtskJB3LMEM_XoOsJdKq2@mail.gmail.com> <201005302101.02794.hselasky@c2i.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <201005302101.02794.hselasky@c2i.net>
            Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes:
: On Sunday 30 May 2010 20:59:33 Garrett Cooper wrote:
: > >     if (version != 1)
: > > -       return (ENOPROTOOPT);
: > > +       return ENOPROTOOPT;
: > 
: > That's actually a style regression (along with any other return calls
: > without parentheses).
: > 
: 
: FYI:
: 
: Linux style mandatates return values without parentheses. And FreeBSD style 
: mandates that opposite!

NetBSD style mandates their absence too...

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100531.000055.923725949146439083.imp>