From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 31 13:25:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (wopr.caltech.edu [131.215.240.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F3114E21 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:25:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: (from mph@localhost) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA84622; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:24:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mph) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:24:56 -0800 From: Matthew Hunt To: Steve Price Cc: Matt Braithwaite , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/16115: New port: www/aolserver3 AOL's web server Message-ID: <20000131132456.A83695@wopr.caltech.edu> References: <867lgqks4w.fsf@zildjian.hq.alink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from sprice@hiwaay.net on Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 02:10:14PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 02:10:14PM -0600, Steve Price wrote: > # Hey, not to whine, but why the name change from aolserver3 to > # aolserver? > > Because I figured we'd never have AOLserver version 2 in the ports > tree. Having the number there usually signifies that we have more > than one version of this port in the tree. I don't believe it will > ever be the case with this port, but I could be wrong. There should be no problem with two ports "aolserver2" and "aolserver". I would expect that future versions would be more like version 3 than 2, so "aolserver" can be neatly upgraded to version 4 or whatever without any mess. -- Matthew Hunt * UNIX is a lever for the http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * intellect. -J.R. Mashey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message