Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:08:34 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: "Eric P. Scott" <eps+whichmoz@ana.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: What to do with Mozilla Message-ID: <1066680514.753.33.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <200310202010.h9KKAdJi004453@anna.ana.com> References: <200310202010.h9KKAdJi004453@anna.ana.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-BXrGZi27ZJ7Dzduf6xTC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 16:10, Eric P. Scott wrote: > If you look at >=20 > http://www.mozilla.org/releases/ >=20 > you'll see: >=20 > End-users are encouraged to use our latest stable[1] build. >=20 > [1] http://www.mozilla.org/releases/stable.html >=20 > That page will tell you Mozilla 1.4.1 (not 1.5) is appropriate > today. Here's a nice diagram illustrating the different > branches: That may be, but the Mozilla.org homepage doesn't mention 1.4.1 at all, and includes 1.5 in a number of places. Plus, Mozilla will start shipping CDs with 1.5 on them. Seems to me, they are encouraging users to go with 1.5. Joe >=20 > http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html >=20 > -=3DEPS=3D- --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-BXrGZi27ZJ7Dzduf6xTC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/lEDCb2iPiv4Uz4cRArVpAJ0UWEhWTwqwAEZxnpsvNZIn2bo49QCZAY7t Ahkf67djarVTFsi9k7B2iMI= =hRsF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BXrGZi27ZJ7Dzduf6xTC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1066680514.753.33.camel>