From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Wed Dec 13 11:32:06 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27563E9AB49
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:32:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1542B6CE6D
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:32:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBDBW5VM089334
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:32:05 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 224247] [patch] RFC 6980 requires to drop fragmented IPv6
 neighbour discovery
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:32:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-224247-2472-Z1hA1CHag3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-224247-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-224247-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:32:06 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224247

Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ae@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #5 from Andrey V. Elsukov <ae@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to lutz from comment #4)
> Thank your for the pointer to functionality duplication in other modules.
>=20
> I moved the flag-setting to the fragment header removal code (which is mo=
re
> appropriate anyway). This code is more likely to be shared by other modul=
es
> (in the case of pf, it is used).
>=20
> Furthermore the flag is renamed to be more self explanatory and the code =
was
> brushed up to match the existing coding style.
>=20
> Did I miss anything else?

This looks good to me.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=