Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:53:36 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        gallatin@cs.duke.edu
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/pci pci.c
Message-ID:  <20040702.105336.11626631.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040702120442.A8994@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
References:  <xzp4qoqijr1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <40E57442.8000602@deepcore.dk> <20040702120442.A8994@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20040702120442.A8994@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
            Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes:
: S=F8ren Schmidt [sos@deepcore.dk] wrote:
: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
: > > Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: > > =

: > >>  Log:
: > >>  Disable native ata support for now, too much breaks
: > > =

: > > =

: > > Could this be controlled by a hint or a tunable?
: > =

: > We'll soon need something better than that, since systems that need=
s =

: > this to boot at all will appear in the not too distant future.
: > Question is how to deal with old systems where the config is borked=
 in =

: > some sense...
: =

: Is there any commonality between the broken systems?
: Mine is a ServerWorks based system.  Details at
: http://people.freebsd.org/~gallatin/ata_irq/
: =

: At the very least, we could have a quirk table..

ServerWorks seems to be a problem child for the new ata code.  It has
busted a few times now as changes have gone in.  I believe that if the
ServerWorks ata is broken, then I have a laptop that is also broken...

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040702.105336.11626631.imp>