From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 09:10:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10703106564A for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24298FC13 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAC9AC0W080780 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:10:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oAC9AC7b080779; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:10:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:10:12 GMT Message-Id: <201011120910.oAC9AC7b080779@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Ewgenij Gawrilow Cc: Subject: Re: ports/152152: math/polymake: Port upgrade request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ewgenij Gawrilow List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:10:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/152152; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ewgenij Gawrilow To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/152152: math/polymake: Port upgrade request Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:40:32 +0100 On 11/12/2010 09:33 AM, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of math/polymake, > > Please note that PR ports/152152 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/152152 > Yes, I agree with the patch, as I've written it myself :-) I wonder if it could be possible to hide the submitter's E-Mail address from the PR page or at least obfuscate it as to make it a little bit harder to harvest by spam senders. I think, putting valid E-Mail addresses on publicly viewable Webpages is no more seasonable. Thank you! -- Ewgenij