Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:05:00 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon <roman@harmonic.co.il> To: Marius <marius@mail.communityconnect.com> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple dropped thttpd connections under high load. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102051102220.23740-100000@shark.harmonic.co.il> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011710520.89201-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Marius wrote: > > I havn't quite gotten around to rebuilding thttpd as people kindly > suggested. Actually, the port of thttpd is an older version of thttpd then We > are running, so it is not just a matter of rebuilding a port. And > secondly, it is a highly customized version of thttpd, patched in several > places to work better with out local setup. It is not a trivial matter, > but I guess that _is_ what I will have to try next. I have been putting > it off. > > Thank you for the suggestions folks. I'll try to report back when I make > some progress for interested parties. (other thttpd users etc.) I aggree that the problem must be fixed (if it exists). But, in your specific situation, in production environment, why not stay with RELENG_3 ? Are you missing some features (since most bugfixes get MFS4'ed)? You can try using some tools like vmstat in order to undertand where's the bottleneck and why... --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.10102051102220.23740-100000>