From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 20 09:25:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA25394 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 09:25:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from uz.ComCAT.COM (uz.ComCAT.COM [204.170.64.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA25389 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 09:25:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jerryr@ComCAT.COM) Received: from uw.comcat.com (uw [204.170.64.249]) by uz.ComCAT.COM (8.8.8/8.8.8/sol2/mh/19980701) with ESMTP; id MAA08245; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:20:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost by uw.comcat.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/sol2/clnt/19981012) with SMTP id MAA28785 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:20:14 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: uw.comcat.com: jerryr owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 12:20:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry X-Sender: jerryr@uw To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: natd -redirect_port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From what I've read and understand from the man natd pages the following command would redirect port 21 on the machine I'm running it (10.1.1.1) to port 21 on 10.1.1.2 . Its obviously not correct cause it doesn't work ;) Anyone have any experience with this? # natd -redirect_port tcp 10.1.1.2:21 21 natd: aliasing address not given To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message