Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:26:38 +0300
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Intel XEON Phi: Linux only?
Message-ID:  <20120620092638.GU2337@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <E7D09E4B-293F-4317-9F6B-62C0D0174C3C@samsco.org>
References:  <4FE0D080.6020802@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAJ-VmonNO1vAvyvpMk_eYTFRf0aHKADjg8fB32_by2G8ZpfgAQ@mail.gmail.com> <E7D09E4B-293F-4317-9F6B-62C0D0174C3C@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--qKjsupNRLbaULa5O
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 09:51:35PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>=20
> > I bet the answer is something like "Get FreeBSD up on it or work with
> > someone who can help you do that."
> >=20
> > It's a catch-22 just like GPU - unless ${COMPANY} has customers using
> > it, they're not likely to dedicate resources, and no users will use it
> > if it doesn't work, so .. who will break the cycle. :)
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
> If I may be blunt here, there's no point in idle speculation when
> there are several FreeBSD committers who work for Intel and write Intel
> drivers for FreeBSD. Let's ask them!

Intel released a documentation set for MIC, which does not even contain
any references to the startup sequence and system management. The only
thing which is provided is patch for Linux kernel.

I will be very delighted and want to appear completely wrong, but my
suspect is that FreeBSD will be in the same position with MIC as it is
with Intel GPUs. I asked Intel representative about MIC programming
documentation some time ago, the answer was 'we do provide extensive
documentation for SDK'. After I noted that this is not what is needed
to support the hardware on !Linux, I only get a blank eye.

--qKjsupNRLbaULa5O
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/hl04ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iCGACfauJDOa/A8vS8RDWB+yjYVgZa
lO8An0L/vEGPYjix1K4W56ExS/TZa2Hm
=I/GG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qKjsupNRLbaULa5O--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120620092638.GU2337>