Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        marius@freebsd.org, gallatin@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, np@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NICs not in GENERIC
Message-ID:  <1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall =
not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
> - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
> - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only?
> - if_hme: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?

If these aren't for i386 hardware, then why would they need to be in the =
i386 GENERIC profile?

Scott




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736>