Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:59:39 -0600 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Cy Schubert <cy@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r510920 - in head/sysutils: . syslog-ng syslog-ng323 Message-ID: <5D82F790-497B-46DB-8819-54BE2FC0C9E9@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <201909031129.x83BTn2d073337@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201909030331.x833VvoQ079054@repo.freebsd.org> <20190903082020.73tdsn7gio7svyfm@ivaldir.net> <201909031118.x83BIUTl031197@slippy.cwsent.com> <201909031129.x83BTn2d073337@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sep 3, 2019, at 05:29, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote: >=20 > In message <201909031118.x83BIUTl031197@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert=20= > writes: >> In message <20190903082020.73tdsn7gio7svyfm@ivaldir.net>, Baptiste=20 >> Daroussin wr >> ites: >>>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 03:31:57AM +0000, Cy Schubert wrote: >>>> Author: cy >>>> Date: Tue Sep 3 03:31:56 2019 >>>> New Revision: 510920 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/510920 >>>> =3D20 >>>> Log: >>>> Thank you to Peter Czanik, of Balabit the producers of syslog-ng, for >>>> a port of the new syslog-ng 3.23 branch. This is 3.23.1. >>>> =3D20 >>>> Submitted by: Peter Czanik (CzP) <peter.czanik@oneidentity.com> >>>> Balabit (a OneIdentity company) / syslog-ng upstream >>>=20 >>> Do we really need all possible revision of syslog-ng in ports? >>>=20 >>> Do they have that many incompatibilities between each others that is it >>> mandatory to have all the supported one? isn't it possible to only live w= it >> =3D >>> h the >>> lastest stable version? it seems most linux distribution are doing that a= nd >>> happy with it, so does pkgsrc and openbsd ports. >>>=20 >>> I think it is more confusing users than it does help them to have 15 dif= fer >> =3D >>> ent >>> version of syslog-ng in ports. >>=20 >> No we don't. I periodically cull older ones following consultation with o= ur=20 >> upstream. It's probably time to do that again. >=20 > I've pinged our upstream for his input. We'll have a plan by the end of th= e=20 > week. Has this been resolved? I saw that you purged unsupported versions, but is t= here a need for every supported version to be in ports? # Adam =E2=80=94 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5D82F790-497B-46DB-8819-54BE2FC0C9E9>