Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:01:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, peterjeremy@optushome.com.au, alfred@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, yar@comp.chem.msu.su Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708271757570.28508@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <200708271757.01674.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200708270850.20904.jhb@freebsd.org> <200708271715.21462.jhb@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708271719510.28508@sea.ntplx.net> <200708271757.01674.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 27 August 2007 05:38:08 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> it is today. >>> >>> So you want to just bump the version everytime a change happens in HEAD? >> >> No, I don't see how you get that from what I said... > > You originally objected to having fts compat symbols as 1.0 and wanted the new > fts to be 1.0. Now you are saying that the new fts can be 1.1 and the old > ones (only used in old current) can remain 1.0. > > That is, now you are saying to do what Yar originally wanted to do before you > objected. No, I still think they should be 1.0 or wait till after the release. I just made some assumption for the sake of giving an example. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0708271757570.28508>