Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:18:25 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD Message-ID: <199502280018.QAA27740@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <9502280011.AA04179@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 27, 95 05:11:41 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Would CTM'ing the library portion of the NetBSD tree be satisfactory? > > > > What would you expect this to do ? > > Keep the history that Nate is unhappy about losing even if FreeBSD > is only an OEM of the library code and doesn't really need the history > itself. I guess you mean CVS then. CTM is more like "rdist" than like "CVS"... -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> TRW Financial Systems, Inc. I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502280018.QAA27740>