From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 7 13:00:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0C2106564A for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 13:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347BE8FC0A for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 13:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q97D0Q0g045736 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 13:00:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q97D0QQJ045729; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 13:00:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 13:00:26 GMT Message-Id: <201210071300.q97D0QQJ045729@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Zbigniew Cc: Subject: Re: misc/172413: Boot "loader" should accept additional parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Zbigniew List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:00:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/172413; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Zbigniew To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/172413: Boot "loader" should accept additional parameters Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 12:57:53 +0000 2012/10/7, Andrey V. Elsukov : > it seems your problem is similar to one described in the > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158358 > > Can you try the loader(8) binary from the FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT? > You can get it from a snapshot: > https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/ Thanks, it seems so! Downloaded the binary package base.txz from https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/i386-i386/10.0-HEAD-20121006-JPSNAP/ftp/base.txz - then extracted "loader", replaced with it the former one, and yes - the system can be booted quite normally, I can see the logo/menu etc. Nevertheless I suppose, that ability to add boot-time parameters would be helpful as "workaround" in such cases. -- regards, Zbigniew