From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 14:49:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81716A41F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:49:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9903C43D45 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:49:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148E6CC986C for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:49:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: vWP6iwkTLu2gwsg8LHyoVe6SkOPmtQLeDzMCOrWXyz6S 1123944542 Received: from gumby.localdomain (dsl-80-41-64-90.access.as9105.com [80.41.64.90]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8000D1E8 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:49:02 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:49:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508131549.02303.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: differences in supported filesystems between FreeBSD versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:49:06 -0000 On Friday 12 August 2005 18:30, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > Dmitry Mityugov writes: > > I am not sure how safe it is. Is it safe to use a HDD partitioned and > > formatted by one version of FreeBSD with a newer version? I know there > > I recently ran into the problem of not being able to access 5.x file > systems and 5.x backups from a 4.x system. (5.2+ and 4.7 & 4.8, IIRC.) That's the other way around where, where an old OS can't read a new partition. I don't think a change in filesystem, would ever be made without support for the old version being provided - at very least as a kernel option. For example COMPAT_FREEBSD4 provides access to filesystems created in version 4 and early releases of 5.x, and it's compiled into the 5.4 generic kernel by default.