From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 09:20:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09350BD2 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33D29B3 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1G9KHCA080225 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:20:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187203] [hyper-v] CARP protocol not work on HYPER-V 2012 R2 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:20:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zhangxia3@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:20:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187203 --- Comment #6 from andy zhang --- Hi Xin, Your patch works well, but I doubt we should add back the following: case SIOCGIFADDR: (in Line 739) Like this: case SIOCSIFADDR: case SIOCGIFADDR: #ifdef INET .... Otherwise there may be issue.(In reply to Xin LI from comment #4) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.