Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:01:32 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/nanobsd ... Message-ID: <1298.1118422892@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:20:55 EDT." <p06210266becf5fcd9731@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <p06210266becf5fcd9731@[128.113.24.47]>, Garance A Drosihn writes: >Back on April 13/2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> Modified files: >> tools/tools/nanobsd make.conf >> Log: >> sort and expand the prunelist in a more or less generally sensibly >> order. Put some strategic comments in about how much storage is >> necessary and a longer explanation on the top. >> >> It is now pretty trivial to put nanoBSD on as little as a 64MB >> CF card. > >Are any macros defined (-D) in CFLAGS when building for nanoBSD, >or other "please make a smaller system" situations? ISTR some >value to check via #ifdef, but now I can't remember what it was >or where I saw it used. Yes, that is what the commit you quote is all about :-) nanobsd uses a private make.conf to keep them in. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1298.1118422892>