Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:16:10 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: Haikal Saadh <wyldephyre2@yahoo.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IBM supercomputer Message-ID: <20000630141610.G91583@bone.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006300854490.21808-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>; from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu on Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 08:55:10AM -0700 References: <007e01bfe325$45a687e0$49a393cb@timberwolf> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006300854490.21808-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 08:55:10AM -0700, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Haikal Saadh wrote: > > > OS/2 perhaps? Wasn't win95 'born' from OS/2? > > s/95/NT/ I think this is a common misconception. Windows NT did (does?) have a OS/2-like subsystem, but the resemblance ends there. NT was much more influenced by VMS, Mach, RSX11, and Windows 3.1 than OS/2. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000630141610.G91583>