From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 24 01:45:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A44016A47B for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D214B43D45 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:44:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5O1iwB6007434 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:44:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1C2ED240A3; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:44:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:44:52 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060624014452.GT11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060620233551.GG11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060621011340.GI11625@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060621173253.GD7596@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TiGNc3ldf20CNpkJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: migrating to 64-bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:45:00 -0000 --TiGNc3ldf20CNpkJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/06/06 Nikolas Britton said: > The consensus seems to be that FreeBSD/amd64 is a tad slower then > FreeBSD/i386 because it has to deal with 32 extra bits. The primary > reason to use FreeBSD/amd64 seems to be if you need greater then 4GB > of RAM. >=20 > This should give you the speed boost your looking for: > CPUTYPE?=3Dpentium2 > CFLAGS+=3D -mtune=3Dnocona > COPTFLAGS+=3D -mtune=3Dnocona >=20 > Put that in /etc/make.conf and recompile ports/kern/world. Cool, thanks. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --TiGNc3ldf20CNpkJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEnJkUKGqCc1vIvggRArwiAKCqHTxDobEJyg2TcSMv4KMZ947eZwCeNYEx m0LFloDsCD9NblFVMSBOHiE= =Qqcl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TiGNc3ldf20CNpkJ--