From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 19 11:20:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B014A16A4CF for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 11:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE3743D70 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 11:20:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4JBK7B0001401 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 11:20:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4JBK723001400; Thu, 19 May 2005 11:20:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:20:07 GMT Message-Id: <200505191120.j4JBK723001400@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: ports/81248: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jose M Rodriguez List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:20:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/81248; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jose M Rodriguez To: Udo Schweigert Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/81248: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:13:25 +0200 El Jueves, 19 de Mayo de 2005 12:39, Udo Schweigert escribi=F3: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:40:43 +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > >>Number: 81248 > >>Category: ports > >>Synopsis: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package > > I wouldn't object to this, although I don't see why we need that as a > port of it own. If that is added to the tree I would highly recommend > that the maintainer of the master and the slave port are the same. > I don't put any MAINTAINER line on the slave port, so the maintainer is=20 the same of the main mutt port. The reason for this is to be able of doing 'pkg_add -r mutt-lite'. I use=20 mutt as a tool for admins in machines that does't have any compiler=20 installed (mainly dns/mail servers). =2D- josemi