Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:30:47 +0100
From:      Jakub Klama <jakub.klama@uj.edu.pl>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FDT changes
Message-ID:  <50D9AA87.1010109@uj.edu.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20121225133904.8063fb1cd193b3078b9c7596@freebsd.org>
References:  <20121225133904.8063fb1cd193b3078b9c7596@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W dniu 2012-12-25 12:39, Aleksandr Rybalko pisze:
> Hello embedded hackers!
>
> (I'm not on ppc@ list, so answer to all or CC me)
>
> I made small patch [0], it's give two features:
> 1. We see physical addresses, like on all other systems which not use
> FDT.
> 2. It's not panic on attempt to do bus_space_map on "reg" propertie
> (for cases when bus is SPI/I2C/etc.)
>
> Please-please-please, give me your comments.
>
> If nobody objects, I will commit it at the end of Jan 2013 (to not
> worry anyone on holidays :) )
>
> [0] http://people.freebsd.org/~ray/2012-12-25_fdt_correct_resource.diff
>
Looks good for me, but what is the point in using pmap_mapdev() instead 
of more generic bus_space_map()?

Jakub



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50D9AA87.1010109>