Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:37:02 +0200
From:      Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall chapter.sgml
Message-ID:  <4E923E2E.8070809@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E91DAA9.1060103@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201110091703.p99H3AXT011263@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E91DAA9.1060103@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011.10.09. 19:32, Glen Barber wrote:
> Consistent pre-populated commit messages:  Another reason conversion to
> SVN would be a "Good Thing(Tm).":-)
What's wrong with the current template? What does SVN do better? No 
criticism, just curiosity because I haven't noticed any difference.

Gabor



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E923E2E.8070809>