Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:37:02 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall chapter.sgml Message-ID: <4E923E2E.8070809@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E91DAA9.1060103@FreeBSD.org> References: <201110091703.p99H3AXT011263@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E91DAA9.1060103@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011.10.09. 19:32, Glen Barber wrote: > Consistent pre-populated commit messages: Another reason conversion to > SVN would be a "Good Thing(Tm).":-) What's wrong with the current template? What does SVN do better? No criticism, just curiosity because I haven't noticed any difference. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E923E2E.8070809>