Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:50:20 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp> Cc: FreeBSD-current <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Subject: Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/* Message-ID: <199902081650.JAA22606@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <36BF00DC.B491EB28@sky.rim.or.jp> References: <36BDAD4E.CC8A2452@sky.rim.or.jp> <199902071644.JAA19307@mt.sri.com> <36BF00DC.B491EB28@sky.rim.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Nate Williams wrote: > > The patch implementing these changes are adequate in the kernel, but are > > incomplete. > > Yes, I should have attached patch for usr.sbin/pccard/* too. The changes to pccardd to support the new 'inactive' flag are still missing. We can power the slot on/off, but pccardd is unaware of these changes. Doesn't it need to be aware of the new 'power' state? Nate > > ps. I like the new 'beep' ioctl better than the original implementation > > in PAO. > > Thanks. But I've changed only a little from PAO implementation. I like > PAO's melodious beep sound (that isn't included in this patch), what you > said is this? Right. Last I looked at PAO the pccard code had modifications all over the kernel. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902081650.JAA22606>