Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 10:43:25 -0700 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Initial NFS Test: Linux vs FreeBSD (769% slower) Message-ID: <44FC8563-AF8D-47F9-A9A8-A4FE57FFC444@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <971747745.58619.1367458184334.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <971747745.58619.1367458184334.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-05-01, at 18:29 , Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote: >>=20 > Oh, one more mount option you could try is "nocto". If the app. is > repeatedly closing/opening the file, that might explain the repeated > "write 1 byte; read some of the file"? cto vs nocto made no difference =85 but, am doing some compares between = oldnfs and nfs =85 it looks like oldnfs cuts off about 60s from the = start time, but want to do a few runs =85 Of note, I reformatted the Linux box with OpenBSD (god, what a nightmare = its ports system is) and OpenBSD startup times are ~180s =85 I'd like to = know what Linux is doing to get 'near local drive' start up times = though, and what risk is associated with it =85=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44FC8563-AF8D-47F9-A9A8-A4FE57FFC444>