Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:42:38 +0200
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc gcc.1
Message-ID:  <20041111164238.GA1063@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
In-Reply-To: <20041111163517.GA56382@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <200411110745.iAB7j1tj085796@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041111144834.GA735@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20041111163517.GA56382@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-11-11 08:35, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > Revision  Changes    Path
> > > 1.20      +1 -1      src/contrib/gcc/gcc.1
> >
> > Does it make sense to attempt writing an mdoc manpage for a more modern
> > version of gcc, using the info manuals as the source?
>
> That is one approach.  We should maybe periodically (say when GCC is
> upgraded across major revisions) build the port of the same version, and
> just commit built man page.[*]  It will be in ancient nroff, but at least
> it will be current.  Maybe we could even write a script to wack it more
> into mandoc format.  I can mail you the 3.4 port manpage to play with.

That would great!  Converting existing text to mdoc is far better than
extracting all the necessary bits from texinfo myself.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041111164238.GA1063>