From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:33:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9590D106564A for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@freebsd.org) Received: from nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CB5B8FC15 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2012 19:33:24 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.36] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2012 19:33:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2012 19:33:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 52261.87007.bm@omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 44936 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2012 19:33:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1326396803; bh=doK6XD9YP7KhNwNvh0iVQM104GGVlwGqCbm6URuH3Qk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1W6EjK6dr8affuI6HpHhj3qCCd9ZHbVa/vN4GjkNnf8/FXFrluw8lb9kosojeYBm0jNzGb9DQ8VtwMlydryHtSYrbMMiHFY0CeDDs7JO4bNOYw/3bqBjctEniZV/pEXoHhXLnL7g6oOJYaHP4UPhfRlh7O/jjOmsDhRZhOOWOXo= X-YMail-OSG: 4m6HZiIVM1nWBXvJ5yJwBpoCa6xQ32FmoghyaputhW3E4LI ixBiSLGAMPkpJ_0aRAwodny0n1En0eDHbuYqxEctxCVGmiUHNCSR1xGUR.dT mqBQkaacsEuvid1VOgdU8uxzcncOG0seBZx3XaLNbGDm6kAJ8CFPvSLkH4us diKC0tAAiZHQ2eLaqk6hK7.L1ovHxRxdZ1eB.TLigpjq11p6iE8YTq6f_8GS fJRjnl1T.wx.XPbZVcDpBuYoZQO_Ciyo4IzIt4g06cAWNMc47njzcIqpT6DW rioU12sc.ilj8xg6qm8bEN3W_nfwUlWhc88B0qAzOcIRF9xGQS.Mhd8O48lv teRCEY0cBJYmE6sZ5kAenCJw5ccvHqhXHfP4GhJzVq7jXirmCv3SMlufGv41 yrDgAmA_8mBmTP_C1NuE95AGR6eR0K8CHPiT8CVeNpTs0wOmwrThUUWjr5oa dfaTNrXNhRjSk8b0eTkLporX.5pxtR1ZVAqb5bKmd Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:33:23 PST X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 Message-ID: <1326396803.27040.YahooMailClassic@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:33:23 -0800 (PST) From: Pedro Giffuni To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <201201120743.41757.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, joel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r229981 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci gnu/dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10kx X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfg@freebsd.org List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:33:24 -0000 Hello;=0A=0A--- Gio 12/1/12, John Baldwin ha scritto:=0A= =0A> Da: John Baldwin =0A> Oggetto: Re: svn commit: r22998= 1 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci gnu/dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/= emu10kx=0A> A: "Pedro F. Giffuni" =0A> Cc: src-committers@= freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, joel@freebs= d.org=0A> Data: Gioved=EC 12 gennaio 2012, 07:43=0A> On Wednesday, January = 11, 2012=0A> 4:17:14 pm Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:=0A> > Author: pfg=0A> > Dat= e: Wed Jan 11 21:17:14 2012=0A> > New Revision: 229981=0A> > URL: http://sv= n.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229981=0A> >=0A...=A0=A0=A0=0A> >=A0=A0=A0The = emu10kx driver is now free from the GPL.=0A> >=A0=A0=A0=0A> >=A0=A0=A0PR:= =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 153901=0A> >=A0=A0=A0Tested by:=A0=A0=A0 mav, joel=0A> = >=A0=A0=A0Approved by:=A0=A0=A0 jhb (mentor)=0A> >=A0=A0=A0MFC after:=A0=A0= =A0 2 weeks=0A> =0A> Is the emu10kx driver a superset of em10k1 now (meanin= g=0A> does it support all=0A> the em10k1 devices and should em10k1 be retir= ed)?=0A> =0A=0ABoth device drivers seem to have diverged significantly=0Aan= d while emu10kx seems to be superior, some people still=0Ahave problems wit= h it:=0A=0Ahttp://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201100024.q0A0OF24069073= =0A=0Aso I suggest we keep both at least for a while.=0A=0A> Also, it seems= we should definitely add 'snd_emu10kx' to=0A> GENERIC on x86 and possible = 'snd_emu10k1'.=0A> =0A=0A+1=0A=0APedro.