Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:55:14 -0500 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk Message-ID: <1TLuvE-000Fa2-Ef@internal.tormail.org> In-Reply-To: <1TLpzq-0009Zh-L4@internal.tormail.org> (Baptiste Daroussin's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:20:32 %2B0200") References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org> <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org> <20121006080539.GB30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5070A018.9010302@FreeBSD.org> <20121008035621.GA91369@FreeBSD.org> <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org> <20121009161009.GF8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <1TLidW-000EbL-Lp@internal.tormail.org> <1TLpzq-0009Zh-L4@internal.tormail.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:51:07PM -1000, Jan Beich wrote:
>
>> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:59:46PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:12:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:56:21AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> >> > > That's because OptionsNG poorly implement mutually exclusive
>> >> > > options. I
>> >> > > hope that eventually dialog's --radiolist would be utilized
>> >> > > for proper
>> >> > > handling, and sane knobs names would be restored.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Sounds like a nice port junior hacker project.
>> >> >
>> >> > Not hat junior dialog(1) can't mix radiolist and classic
>> >> > checklist that is
>> >> > why it doesn't use it, using libdialog(3), it would be easiy to
>> >> > implement,
>> >> > but that won't be usable for a while (until all supported version of
>> >> > freebsd has it.
>> >>
>> >> Ah, OK, that explains it (lack of radiobuttons now). Is it known what's
>> >> preventing all supported versions to have working libdialog(3),
>> >> if we have
>> >> working dialog(1) already?
>> >>
>> >> ./danfe
>> >
>> > new dialog is only on 9.x and 10.x, if will require to code some special
>> > dialog(1) dedicated for ports, MFCing libdialog to 8 and 7 is complicated
>> > because the API isn't compatible.
>>
>> Why not add devel/cdialog to bootstrap on < 9.0 and install it only when
>> BATCH is not set?
>>
>
> That do not change the fact that ${SOMEONE} will have to code a dialog(1)
> dedicated for ports, the library is able to let us mix radio and
> check, but the
> frontend (dialog(1)) is still not able to.
>
> if someone stepup to do it, I'll be more than happy :)
Did you miss one?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-November/064363.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-December/064772.html
>
> regards,
> Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1TLuvE-000Fa2-Ef>