From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 30 12:00:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF2416A5A3 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390C14438E for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:34:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.141] (helo=anti-virus02-08) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FwHGB-00016b-Ar; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:34:07 +0100 Received: from [82.41.34.175] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FwHGA-0000a9-1N; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:34:06 +0100 Message-ID: <44A50C2E.7080500@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:34:06 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <200606300808.k5U88c42075685@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200606300808.k5U88c42075685@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:00:47 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: >2) as there are many connections comming from search engines siders > (90% of all the established connections), I'd like to limit the > ressources that spiders are using. One way would be through IPFW, > but are there better ways? Is there a way to limit/prioritize in > Apache (not that I know any). > > google robots.txt which ought to limit what the spiders look at (but consequently reduces what they index, as well). Overall, though, your problem sounds more like a piece of software bloating as it runs; the longer it runs the more memory it consumes. Does the machine end up swapping? Try tracking memory usage. --Alex