From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 21 22:55:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F8816A515; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E449813C4BA; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([85.172.12.140]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id l2LMt8IA047427; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:55:18 +0300 (MSK) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HU9g6-0000Hb-QE; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:53:10 +0300 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20070316120038.2iizia24mc4wcw8s@webmail.leidinger.net> <22612203@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <79670265@bsam.ru> <20070321084654.nycupaslkww44c4w@webmail.leidinger.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:53:10 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20070321084654.nycupaslkww44c4w@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:46:54 +0100") Message-ID: <01106633@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, rdivacky@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.6.16 for linuxulator & 7.0 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:55:31 -0000 On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:46:54 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:24:54 +0300): > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:23:48 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:00:38 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > >> > ATM it doesn't look like we can enable 2.6.16 by default in 7.0. > >> The reasons: > > > >> It's a pity. > > > >> > - java showstopper (epoll not implemented) > >> > - futex/TLS for amd64 not in -current for testing > >> > - futexes not completely right > >> > - *at() not implemented > >> > - the time to test a 2.6.16 default until 7.0 shrinks fast > > > >> > Roman has some preliminary work regarding *at() and it looks good to > >> > him. He wants me to test some stuff but I don't have enough time in > >> > the next weeks because of work related stuff. Any volunteers to help > >> > out? > > > >> The next week I'll have an access to needed hardware and have some > >> (not many but...). I'm waiting for instructions. > > > > I've got a machine and some time for tests. What should I do? > Apply the p4 diff (linked from the wiki page) and apply it. Then run a > program which previously had problems because of a missing openat(). > If the program moans about another *at() call then, tell Roman that > you need more *at() calls implemented. :) Hm, I don't know such programms so far. Roman? > Roman can tell you more. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve