From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 21:49:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F370C16A4CE; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:49:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44F043D54; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:49:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADE93513D2; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:52:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:52:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen Message-ID: <20041105215220.GA32961@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <639522fe041103144732ea6683@mail.gmail.com> <1099522198.59328.4.camel@blueheron.ahze.net> <200411050919.09547.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411050919.09547.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Michael Johnson cc: Jie Gao cc: current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:49:52 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:19:08AM +0100, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote: > On Wednesday 03 November 2004 23:49, Michael Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 15:47 -0700, Jie Gao wrote: > > > I just wonder if it is safe to use -O2 -pipe for kernel + world on > > > 5-STABLE now. > > works okay for me >=20 > And ports on 5-STABLE? Same as on 6.x - the bugs are in the ports themselves. Don't do it if you want your ports to work correctly. Kris --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBi/YUWry0BWjoQKURAsTXAJ9xVXe9uMLbZjl95r862q/F0r3jzACfZGyQ ipzIJ8SisfEnA8RxgRhYH0g= =gQFz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--