From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 22:27:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C4916A401; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C4413C4B5; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l29MQpfQ002695; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:26:51 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Doug Barton Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:26:57 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200703081412.l28EC8fq003028@repoman.freebsd.org> <45F1DE1C.4020408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <45F1DE1C.4020408@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703091426.58185.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Jean-Yves Lefort , Jeremy Messenger , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/deskutils/basket Makefile ports/security/gnutls Makefile ports/security/dirmngr Makefile ports/security/libotr Makefile ports/security/libgcrypt Makefile ports/security/gnupg Makefile ports/security/gpgme Makefile ports/security/libksba ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:27:06 -0000 On Friday 09 March 2007 14:22, Doug Barton wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > The 104877 fix is not in ports tree right now, so I think we still > > need to put an entry in UPDATING for our users' sake. > > I just started a thread on -ports@ for this topic, since now that I > understand it, I agree that it's a more serious issue. > Killing the reply and adding some of it here. You commented on > > xscreensaver-5.01_3 > > Something seems very odd here. I would say off hand that most of the > ports you mentioned don't need libgpg-error for anything, and I can't > imagine anything that xscreensaver would use it for. > That could be true for many of them. What I ran is the following # cat pkgreq #! /bin/sh cd /var/db/pkg pkg_info -R "$1*" | more The list was built from runing "pkgreq libgpg-error". The boinc-* ports, for example, all list it as a build and run requirement but none of them died. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://www.soyandina.com/ "I am Andean project". http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html