From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 17 11:50:34 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34C2106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com)
Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635D68FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from bonomi@localhost)
	by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q6HBpq8a039504
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:51:52 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:51:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Message-Id: <201207171151.q6HBpq8a039504@mail.r-bonomi.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207160814480.4790@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:50:34 -0000

> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 16 01:17:33 2012
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:15:13 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem?
>
> > read attempts. In worst case, there will be "gaps" in the
> > result.
>
>
> >Surely SpinRite is "more clever" than that, 
> i would bet otherwise. simple tools and free tools are always better

You continue to demonsteate that you "don't know what you don't know".