From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 20:59:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EE2E35 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery.b@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66278FC0C for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l39so7952814qcs.13 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:59:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+JmCXZFjmAV8NcIK+G+8nSKPARf+RJlOrsHUPraVqGg=; b=XxffhORgb0VqIB2Jqrt992JchIBJese1rPFclrpoKRPy9mMzJR6oeDAOU6Mejj5Ufm beDeEPzr0aka8eLDmrhZoApoi8UfqVbrbuUpFpWHUBZFcrtoasBifmRFNAt08oQVPL73 BYuzg0rHZzfOeJyC1LYpmO0ZT9s48FzEj8LE5k7oBDSt95GSe0c7cfHzMyiJxR2R7cBL 74abOEvVGCK3cNNt5gISHdBYUQKgMbIuuDowNupQBw5dXUOAZomHqyTEBIX2gn/FklGk h7glZTFJl/xw2/Rhf0djXViN3u8ioyeCN/yzli5uTULKA22Ca+20XMjWQzNq4tRhe4qI hztA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.178.153 with SMTP id bm25mr9339036qcb.131.1350507573981; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.61.233 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:59:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.1-RC2 - could it be that the installer does not write the MBR? From: Brandon Allbery To: Rainer Duffner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:59:35 -0000 On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > I tried to install 9.1-RC2 amd64 on two disks that previously had some > version of Solaris installed (with grub as boot-manager). > The installation would always be successful, but it would just boot to > grub and then sit there. > RC1 wasn't very good at it either. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix/linux, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure http://sinenomine.net