Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:11:47 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! Message-ID: <20071212231147.GA61429@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com> References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> <20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> [071212 15:09] wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support.. > >the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited > >functionality. > >It's done that way so I can put it in RELENG_6/7 without breaking ABIs (I > >hope). > >Later there will be a more flexible version for-current. > > > >Here's the question.. > > > >I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on.. > >e.g. if you are usinghe second routing table, you could say I've set xxx > >to 1 > >(0 based).. > > In the spirit of your subject, why not call them 'sheds'? Because it's horrible. :) -- - Alfred Perlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071212231147.GA61429>