From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat May 15 17:43:01 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692A464BE43 for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FjCR92Ldvz3Cm5 for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5089F64BE42; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5051164BD5E for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FjCR91h1mz3Cwq for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229C51855 for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14FHh1a2090135 for ; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14FHh16Y090134 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255846] x11-themes/kde-icons-noia: Add LICENSE, Take MAINTAINERship Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255846 --- Comment #9 from Chris Hutchinson --- (In reply to Tobias Kortkamp from comment #8) Thanks for your attention to this, Tobias. I guess I'm a bit confused. All I'm really suggesting is to drag the LICENSE conditional block out of the Makefile.icons file, and put it into each of the Makefiles that *don't* have a license defined within their source. I only started down this trail; as pkg-fallout suddenly started spamming my mailbox with failures for the kde-icons-nuovext2 that I maintain. Curious, as it had worked for several years w/o problems and nothing in the port had changed. So as I looked into it I discovered that a couple others had a license defined/included. But weren't used. So thought I should define them within their Makefile' with the license included with the source, and drag the conditional license block out of Makefile.icons and place it into those that _don't_ come with a license defined. It won't change the "no dist" definition in any way. It just seems to make it easier to actually define a license when one is defined/included within the source. Am I missing something? Thanks again, Tobias. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=