Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:54:19 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= <elferdo@gmail.com> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any way to add USES clause depending on two options without including bsd.port.options.mk? Message-ID: <CAMwkeZwH7KqU0BG7xoX_Qeu8gZ%2B%2BZ4uFhqLO79xe5v=WK5j0Fg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4e06c0b2-e70e-68e8-732b-97774cff8b2d@rawbw.com> References: <4e06c0b2-e70e-68e8-732b-97774cff8b2d@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 23 jun. 2016 11:26 p. m., "Yuri" <yuri@rawbw.com> escribi=C3=B3: > > I have two port options: GUI NLS. > > I would like to have USES=3Dgettext only when both GUI and NLS are "on". > > If it was only one option, say NLS, NLS_USES=3Dgettext would work. > > But what about the two options case? Is there any magic to do this without .include <bsd.port.options.mk> ? > > > Yuri > Hi Yuri, Could you please elaborate on the reasons why you want to do that? I don't see how that particular combination of options would introduce a dependence that neither of them alone would. And then, why not include port.options.mk? Then you could explicitly check for both options being set. Cheers, Fernando
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMwkeZwH7KqU0BG7xoX_Qeu8gZ%2B%2BZ4uFhqLO79xe5v=WK5j0Fg>