From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 03:04:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D04A01658 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 03:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vijju.singh@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F090F176F for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 03:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vijju.singh@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ED783A01657; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 03:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1C0A01656 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 03:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vijju.singh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC168176E for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 03:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vijju.singh@gmail.com) Received: by iofb144 with SMTP id b144so45820698iof.1 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:04:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vsnSljsTFCmrGr8PSR1BHFVkSp+3UMjMQWjpmS+oVN4=; b=HY20PmMk7oRRMynDiFABgfOMq5WqFXx3p+7/Ae0bNBJxhNpUhvLgJYtiW4NazWlzb/ Mn5pfSwVDxRWDajawJOq/sTeRrg6UMHBU9LK0W58YqNTfXS7XDmOhxv6FvbZG2dm9Gwf I6cHqpbeSRNMwdATLOa+/JY6fLc0NWaQewTEqOucOCOSSFpNwMwnwS93DHA9w0spFpSc q9cEWrbCfW12CPEQUHB4b0V6EL0aBfuGb0MbuIOGnD5MMuDPdukLluIVVDVHpyyqJDtn qqs2fXsPRDk8GFeKb7REMDyHoMbVrm2IWbJ56A31w8I8C3wuvahmRlkCoWHIyO0Su0Vu 9Kxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.131.134 with SMTP id n6mr48720351ioi.192.1441854242973; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.131.231 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:04:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: wakeup in g_do_wither From: Vijay Singh To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 03:04:04 -0000 Hi, in g_do_wither(), would it be better to release the mutex after the wakeup() call? As an example, g_cancel_event() does this. -vijay