Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:13:28 +0200 From: Eivind Olsen <eivind@aminor.no> To: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The ongoing saga of lsof-4.71.1 Message-ID: <303CFF8A54BBC8E8D8B627FA@[192.168.0.2]> In-Reply-To: <20040428043909.GA18110@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> References: <20040426221217.GA40770@wombat.localnet> <20040427220951.E31761@sherman.trismegistus.net> <20040428043909.GA18110@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 28. april 2004 12:39 +0800 leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw> wrote: > I have these in my src tree, do you have them as well? I just looked at the following file: > sys/i386/include/_types.h:typedef unsigned int __cpumask_t; ...and it had no mention of any cpumask: eivind@vimes:/usr/src/sys/i386/include > grep -i cpumask _types.h eivind@vimes:/usr/src/sys/i386/include > I'm using RELENG_5_2 (FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5), and it comes with revision 1.7 of that _types.h file. The __cpumask_t definition came in revision 1.9 of that file, and that revision is only available in CURRENT as far as I can tell. So, my unqualified guess is that lsof is incorrectly assuming that every FreeBSD-version of at least 5.2.0 has __cpumask_t (it checks for FREEBSDV>=520). -- Regards / Hilsen Eivind Olsen <eivind@aminor.no>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?303CFF8A54BBC8E8D8B627FA>