From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 23:13:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2384A16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vimes.aminor.no (vimes.aminor.no [213.187.177.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B4E43D2F for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:13:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@aminor.no) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (rincewind.eivind [192.168.0.2]) by vimes.aminor.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845211700F; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:13:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:13:28 +0200 From: Eivind Olsen To: leafy , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <303CFF8A54BBC8E8D8B627FA@[192.168.0.2]> In-Reply-To: <20040428043909.GA18110@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> References: <20040426221217.GA40770@wombat.localnet> <20040427220951.E31761@sherman.trismegistus.net> <20040428043909.GA18110@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.3 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: The ongoing saga of lsof-4.71.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:13:24 -0000 --On 28. april 2004 12:39 +0800 leafy wrote: > I have these in my src tree, do you have them as well? I just looked at the following file: > sys/i386/include/_types.h:typedef unsigned int __cpumask_t; ...and it had no mention of any cpumask: eivind@vimes:/usr/src/sys/i386/include > grep -i cpumask _types.h eivind@vimes:/usr/src/sys/i386/include > I'm using RELENG_5_2 (FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5), and it comes with revision 1.7 of that _types.h file. The __cpumask_t definition came in revision 1.9 of that file, and that revision is only available in CURRENT as far as I can tell. So, my unqualified guess is that lsof is incorrectly assuming that every FreeBSD-version of at least 5.2.0 has __cpumask_t (it checks for FREEBSDV>=520). -- Regards / Hilsen Eivind Olsen