From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 10:11:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D557F16A420 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:1f1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E21D13C4C2 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from prawn.unsane.co.uk (150.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9UABmsf071057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:11:49 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4727035C.5040408@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:11:40 +0000 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071029) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <20071029201941.GA99664@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20071029201941.GA99664@thought.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: is this for OO-2 for FBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:11:49 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > I'm in the middle of upgrading some platforms and just caught > OOo_OOG680_m6_source.tar.bz2 (278MB) being downloaded. The port > says that this is OO-2.3, but the build says Ishould have > 11GB of disk and ~2GB of memory. > > I somehow downloaded OO_2.3 as a package on one platform. Does > this make any sense? How many of us have 2 gigs of memory? > Seems more than a biit irrational to me. Or did my > portupgrade -aP grab the wrong port? > I think the problem is that the build does take so long and so much resources that the package updates are a bit scarce. The latest I can see on the mirrors is openoffice.org-2.3.20070910.tbz which doesnt seem to fit the numbering scheme for the openoffice.org-2 port but does fit openoffice.org-2-RC which seems a bit odd. I would probably just get the latest package from the openoffice package site (ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.3.0/i386/FreeBSD6) and upgrade manually. As a 7.0 user I had to build my own which took a while. Vince > gary >