From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 8 14:53: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA4837B446 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13XW4v-000GS1-00; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 22:52:57 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA29393; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 22:52:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 22:52:56 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: chown mountpoints Message-ID: <20000908225256.A26144@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is it really necessary to chown the mountpoints for every boot to allow non-users to mount/umount floppies and zips? It seems silly. jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message