From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 16 19:12:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCE014E7A for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:12:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from lot.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@lot.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.106]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA11788; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 13:41:52 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199903170256.VAA20641@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 13:41:52 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: latest -current doesn't execute BSDI-binary bladeenc Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 17-Mar-99 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > => > The bug is on the web site, not in the kernel. > I'd consider the web-site a "spec" and the kernel -- "implementation". > By this logic, the kernel needs fixing... I think its a little too rapidly evolving for that, especially -current. > =Probably. I was just about to investigate this possibility. > It should definitly be on automaticly if the memory configuration > is not large, if you ask me... That would be nice, but it has to be an option before you can make it the default behaviour. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message