Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Nov 2001 15:07:21 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc:        Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch>, Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>, Marco Molteni <molter@tin.it>
Subject:   Re:SecureID (was 802.1x)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111091505400.81070-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011109135406.A30773@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Brooks Davis wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 10:40:28PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > It could also better interact with other userland services like login
> > or PAM. Think with logging in, it will authenticate you to the
> > (physical) network and the (ethernet) switch will put you into the
> > right VLAN for example. Or it could prompt for secure-id.
> 
> This one is pretty critical.  If you can't support SecurID passwords
> (60sec lifetime) then there are lots of sites that won't be able to work
> with the system at all.  We've already seen this problem with the Cisco
> LEAP stuff.

Does anyone else have secureID fobs running in FreeBSD based systems?
(if so I'd like to chat)

> 
> -- Brooks
> 
> -- 
> Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
> PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0111091505400.81070-100000>