Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 14:10:55 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ECGS ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811031408140.19544-100000@thelab.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <19981103095412.A12327@nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Nov 1998, David O'Brien wrote:
> > but the last I've heard on the list is that v1.1.1 is about to be
> > released...is that not more stable then a 'development version'?
>
> That sounds like a good target for the EGCS port then. Any timeline?
Its in pre-release right now, so all things considered, upgrading
the port to that from what we are at now might be worth the effort?
> > From what I'm gathering, it looks like EGCS went super-strict on the
> > conformance side, and MICO might be doing something that the 1.1.x series
>
> Nothing wrong with adhearing to the ISO spec. The vast margarity of C++
> compilers are so far from the ISO spec it is impossible to know what C++
> really is these days.
No disagreement from me...my problem was a misunderstanding about
what egcs-2 meant :(
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811031408140.19544-100000>