From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Mar 31 12:14:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CAA37B71D for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:14:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f2VKE3102325 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG.AVP; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:14:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with UUCP id f2VKE2i02319; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:14:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (dhcp0.neland.dk [192.168.5.100]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.3/8.11.0) with SMTP id f2VKDqo05288; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:13:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <01d501c0ba1f$23cc06a0$6405a8c0@neland.dk> Reply-To: "Leif Neland" From: "Leif Neland" To: "ryanb" Cc: References: <00e201c09c62$fbd45aa0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> <20010329101658.A87734@bjorn.goddamnbastard.org> Subject: Re: Mirrorred webservers: Updating, logging. Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:35:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by ns.internet.dk id f2VKE2i02319 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "ryanb" To: "Leif Neland" Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 6:16 PM Subject: Re: Mirrorred webservers: Updating, logging. > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:04:10AM +0100, Leif Neland wrote: > > We're thinking about mirroring our webservers for redundancy. > > > > There exist different solutions, however, I have not seen any mentioning on how to update the sites; the customers shouldn't have to update two sites; it should work transparently. > > Would there be an option to use an NFS server to house all the content > and logs, thus leaving a common thread for any amount of machines you'd > like to slave from a single set of data? A user could edit/upload to > their space housed on a file server with changes effective immediately > on _all_ client machines. > That still leaves that NFS-server as the single point of failure. So that is no option. I discovered some smart guy had set our secondary nameserver to have its files nfs-mounted from the primary. So much for redundancy... Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message